As Taichung is recruiting more and
more NESTs this semester, the English Advisory Group has also been assigned to
help evaluate their job performance as part of a panel. I got to observe at
three schools and offered my feedback and opinions to the school staff and those
foreign English teachers, which was a fantastic learning experience for me as
well. The whole process can be divided into three parts:
1. Presentation
The director of the Academic Office or
the Taiwanese co-teacher would give a presentation about how the NEST does
collaborative lesson planning with his or her colleagues. The idea is to have
as much English and cultural exposure for both students and teachers with a
variety of club activities and cultural events.
I especially admired how they make
good use of each school’s unique strengths, such as aboriginal cultural significances,
robotics and coding programs, or reality virtual studio.
2. Observation
Of the three demonstration classes I
observed, I noticed that they were either theme-based or of textbook extension.
For example, one FET taught comparatives and superlatives under the theme,
Earth Day. Students were comparing how fast different objects and materials will
be decomposing in landfill sites.
Another good example was how a foreign
teacher and her co-teacher integrated local aboriginal culture to teach the
ordering of Western, Chinese, and Atayal names. Through repetition in different
contexts, the students were able to master simple English self-introduction.
3. Discussion
During the Q&A session, the
professor and I would get invited to give our feedback and ask some questions.
I would specifically point out some highlights, including student involvement, task
scaffolding, and real-life scenarios. On top of that, I’d offer my personal
experiences and some alternatives to their original curriculum design, too.
The classroom observation form has
some criteria in it. I had to fill it out and give an overall score and some
comments. I hope I was able to contribute a bit to the NEST program by helping
review its effectiveness.
I was lucky enough to get invited and
work with some very brilliant and dedicated FETs and elementary EAG members for
collaborative lesson planning once a month. My school doesn’t have a NEST for
now, but I learned a lot from them about how this program has lots of room for
improvement. The Taichung Education Bureau should’ve done more to improve the
program quality instead of focusing on the quantity of how many students to be
involved.
The whole idea of the NEST program is to help create more authentic opportunities for Taiwanese students to really USE the language. In HPJH, I saw those students were so willing to speak and interact with their FET. That, compared to all sorts of statistics and numbers, is what truly matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment