This is actually the second time that I attended
the TBL workshop by the British Council. The first one helped me a lot understand how the ideas and
techniques of this communicative approach take shape in the real world. It’s
really good I can refresh my memory and also gain new perspectives in terms
of TBL, especially I know I’m on the right track after briefly talking about one of my TBL lesson plans with the Director English, Jamie. Also, he kindly offered some very useful suggestions of differentiating some of the activities in the main tasks :
Classroom
Language
As
far as a teacher of English as a foreign language is concerned, classroom
language includes greetings, instructions, guidance, and feedback. It is comprised
of three different types: Procedural language is the one used by the teacher to
set up the activity. Functional language is needed by the students to complete
the activity, and I came to realize the importance of it because students
require it to achieve the goals of the assigned tasks. This part of classroom
language should be included in pre task(s) so that students would also have the
foundation in order to speak the language. Target language is what we intend
our students to learn, and to my surprise, it is the least important of them
all.
Tasked Based
Learning
A
good task engages students’ interest, focuses on meaning, has an outcome and is
communicative. Compared with the PPP approach, learning occurs when students
finish the tasks instead of doing pre-determined mechanical drills in the
textbooks.
Differentiation
When
conducting differentiated tasks, consider:
Children
come to our class with different levels of ability, different learning styles,
different personal experiences and so on.
I’ve been so obsessed with the idea that
the purpose of learning a language is to be able to speak it, which is very
difficult to realize in such a test-oriented setting here. Nevertheless, not
only have I been trying to use as much English as I can in class but also
getting my students to speak with tasks that serve as scaffolding to gradually
help them overcome the fear and actually have a glimpse of what it’s like to
communicate for a real purpose.
Having only passion is definitely not
enough. At first, it was really difficult and frustrating because students always
seemed clueless about what to do to achieve the desired outcome. Then, I
gradually learned to plan my lessons and put them into practice effectively in
my class with the help of the online TESOL course, Cooperative Learning and
Task Based Learning, which literately equipped me with all the techniques I
need to realize my dream.
Now,
I can do teaching demonstrations outside of my own school, with students I’ve
never met before. Also, I’m working with a brilliant Japanese teacher for our
Skype exchange project that requires my students to speak English and
communicate with their Japanese counterparts. On top of that, I can also devise
intriguing activities for the students to have fun while also applying what
they’ve learned at English camps. After more than ten years of teaching, I
finally can learn to appreciate the fun and sense of achievement of my job as a
junior high English teacher.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThank you. Very detailed.
ReplyDeleteI did TBLT in one of my CELTA Tp and I was given a feedback based on the functional language cycle. I am still confused as in why the tutor was asked me that I did not scaffold the task. I had a model of listening followed by a gap fill. I gave them useful phrases and then I gave them a map and a toy car with a destination. They were busy talking as to how to reach there. I gave them enough time to practice and then they were asked to perform.
I Would love to hear from you as to where I went wrong.
Why the tutor asked me that my task was not scaffolded. He said that I should have asked them to write the dialogues and then practice.
ReplyDelete