While the monster, COVID, is still ravaging the world, people in Sweet Potato are being complacent about their success in containing the evil force. However, unaware of its new power, the island has been breached. People are panicking and finger-pointing. Will this tiny island once again unite and know its true worth?
Fair and square?
We got screwed. No
doubt about that. Yes, I've got proof, too.
I've watched the
live performances on video many times and seriously questioned the fairness and
professional judgment of this year's competition results. As you can see
from the video,
the protagonist alone did much of the talking for two minutes and twenty
seconds into the story except for the chants. It was pretty much like that
throughout the whole performance.
Competition
Criteria
I didn't mean to
single out anyone, but for a fair and professional side-by-side comparison,
let's review the contest with the official readers' theater judging rubrics:
- Story(25%): an original story related
to real-life should win brownie points, especially when most competitors
would use ready-made materials
- Pronunciation(50%): including stress,
pronunciation, intonation, connected speech, and vocal emotion
- Interaction(25%): all characters
should be involved throughout the whole story using gestures, facial
expressions, and body language
Inspired by actual
events about pandemic prevention measures here in Taiwan, All for One and One for
All is a sequel to last year's Tiny but Mighty. There are allusions and hidden meanings
in subtle references to the real-world struggles and triumphs, including the
Delta variant, the American and Japanese vaccine donations, and Taiwan's
homegrown vaccine and semiconductors.
The other school
used the famous story from a published picture book. Unevenly
distributing the lines is a big no-no. When only one or two students say the
most lines, those who have nothing to do would be standing there and beginning
to look dull.
Moving on to the
second and third categories, it'd be a no-brainer as well. Our students' pronunciation, to my ears, was nearly perfect. When it comes to getting involved
in the story, ALL of them, including two narrators, paid attention to every
little detail for the sole purpose of bringing the story alive. You won't see
any of them detached from it anytime only because they've done their
lines.
Winners fail
until they succeed
While we were
expecting another convincing win, the announcement of getting ONLY second place
took us off guard, leaving the students on the verge of crying. As we were
about to head back to school, some students finally could no longer hold back
their tears in the parking lot, and they were even still sobbing while having
lunch in school. Both Alex and I were devastated but managed to pull ourselves
together to console those broken hearts.
Now that I got my
hands on the officially released videos, I've watched the contest again and
again and become more certain that we got screwed, not to mention some dark
side I got tipped off later that day. They only got away with it because no one
realized what they did, so I'll bring it up at many opportunities: in this blog
post, at a workshop, in a conversation with another professional, you name
it.
If what I heard about the judging panel becomes a reality next year, Alex and I will compete again to win back the third championship before we retire.
No comments:
Post a Comment